Morgantown newspaper removes three legislators from front-page photo
The above report from West Virgina Public Broadcasting is making the rounds. It's the latest, and one of the most embarrassing examples of utterly unethical photo manipulation in the news.We're supposed to report the news, not make it. Right? And this is certainly making the news for all the wrong reasons.
I hope I was crystal clear in my previous post about the use of Adobe Photoshop in the newsroom.The most disturbing aspect of this report is the reaction of The Dominion Post editor Geri Ferrara. She is surprised anyone would object to the manipulation. For some reason, she seems to think that designating the picture as a "photo illustration" in the caption is sufficient. Further, she believes the paper's policy of not publishing photos of politicians running for office trumps accuracy and honesty in her publication's visual reportage.
I'd like to further quote National Press Photography Association Ethics Chair John Long:
"If a picture looks real – in the context of news – it better be real. You cannot caption away a visual lie."
Visual illiteracy is the culprit, in this case. If photographs and other types of visual journalism were given the same respect as words, these kinds of transgressions wouldn't occur in the first place.
I feel the need to apologize for one of my so-called colleagues.
Folks, you should expect information reported in the news to be accurate. It's all about credibility. Without, I don't have a job. Do I?
Thoughts?
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Quisque sed felis. Aliquam sit amet felis. Mauris sem
Posts
on May 19, 2010 at 6:32 PM
You know, Scott, if this were a small weekly or community paper, I might shrug this off to small-town politics or even ignorance. But when the editor of a 20,000 circ daily does this, and then in essence says, "What's the big deal?", that is just jaw-droppingly wrong. I can not even imagine ANY justification for this. I mean, this editor is basically thumbing her nose at one of the most staunch code of ethics in our business. I'd be interested to know how readers of The Dominion Post reacted to this revelation.
on May 20, 2010 at 6:08 AM
One more thing. This kind of transgression happens, all too often, at every level. There are plenty of editors at major publications whose backgrounds are solely in writing or graphic design and have little regard for photographs.
There are too many writers who simply think that photographs are inferior to words in their ability to communicate. Pictures are for morons who can't read. Simply a necessary evil.
And there are too many graphic designers who treat photographs as play things – design elements, not news content.
These people infiltrate every level of news publications. Unfortunately, photo staffs have been gutted at publications everywhere as cost-cutting measures. So who's left to make important editorial decisions about photographs?
The digital era has been both a godsend and a curse to photojournalism, and the ethical ramifications are something we are going to have to grapple with for some time to come.
Post a Comment